As I looked through the 3 different sets of standards online, I got a sense of each one trying to create an individual name for itself, and therefore did not get a sense of unity or having a common goal. As I looked further into each resource, I found that each site was saying practically the same thing but just used a different way of communicating it with the verbage.
The subject area that I researched was in middle school math in the topic of geometry and measurement. In the Common Core standards site, they broke down the topics very clearly and used less formal language to communicate what the students should be able to do at the end of each unit. It didn't necessarily tell the teacher how to present the information which is great I think because it gives teachers flexibility to use whatever activities they want to use. In the NCTM site, the language they used was a little more formal compared to the Common Core resource, but was still understandable for me to interpret. Lastly, in the Connected Math standards, they presented the topics by grade level and associated them with specific workbooks (ones you find at teacher supply stores) that have catchy titles in an attempt to grab students' interest. Overall, each of the standards' sites presented similar topics, but just had their own language to convey their message, and because of the competition aspect of these three resources, I didn't get the feeling of unity that I'd like to see in the education realm; especially when it comes to teaching to standards.
No comments:
Post a Comment